In 2025, psychological safety at work has become a central pillar of psychosocial risk prevention, quality of working life (QWL or QVCT), and occupational health, on the same level as HSE safety, accident prevention, and professional risk assessment. It is closely connected to safety training initiatives, occupational health and safety training, and the strengthening of a prevention oriented and wellbeing focused corporate culture.
Psychological Safety at Work
Definition, Key Issues, and Link with Occupational Risk Prevention
Imagine an airline crew facing an emergency. If a co pilot hesitates to report an anomaly for fear of judgment, the risk of a workplace accident or a serious error increases. This is the principle theorized by Amy Edmondson, a Harvard professor, in 1999. Psychological safety is the shared belief within a team that one can take interpersonal risks, ask a question, admit a mistake, challenge an idea, without fear of humiliation, rejection, or retaliation.
This ability to speak openly has become a central lever in psychosocial risk prevention programs, conflict management, stress management, and the prevention of burnout and occupational illnesses.
In Canada in 2025, this concept has evolved from a managerial ideal into a normative requirement, anchored in the National Standard CAN CSA Z1003, updated in 2024, on psychological health and safety in the workplace. The standard defines psychological safety as the absence of psychological harm, protecting dignity, respect, and inclusivity, while fostering collective learning.
Far from being simple “niceness”, psychological safety is a strategic performance lever. It leads to more innovative teams, with a 20 to 30 percent increase in ideas shared, higher engagement and resilience, with a 25 percent reduction in turnover and a decrease in psychosocial risks and sickness absence, as shown by safety days, industrial safety audits, and national OHS summits in Canada.
From a pedagogical perspective, it can be visualized as a spectrum. At one extreme, fear paralyzes, creating toxic silence, stress overload, and an increase in musculoskeletal disorders and workplace accidents. At the other extreme, trust liberates, enabling accelerated learning, cooperation, and improved quality of working life.
Psychological Safety at Work
Key Figures and International Comparison 2025
Data from 2025, drawn from HR barometers, occupational health and safety audits, mental health summits, and psychosocial risk reports, reveal significant disparities. These differences reflect varying levels of normative maturity in occupational risk prevention, risk assessment, and implementation of the risk assessment document.
Canada
Approximately 32 percent at high risk, 68 percent perceive their workplace as psychologically safe. The Z1003 standard and structured psychosocial risk prevention approaches, management coaching, and shared vigilance significantly improve positive perceptions, according to mental health barometers.
Belgium
Approximately 30 to 33 percent do not feel free to speak up. HR surveys, such as Securex, show that weak leadership triples burnout risk and absenteeism, despite the existence of prevention plans and HSE training.
France
Approximately 40 to 47 percent of employees experience mental distress. Occupational health barometers show a slight deterioration, with a strong focus on QWL and QVCT, wellbeing at work, workplace mental health prevention, and ISO 45001 compliance.
Spain
Approximately 35 to 40 percent report high stress levels. European studies from EU OSHA highlight priorities around psychosocial risks, workplace risk analysis, accident prevention, and physical risk management, supported by risk management software tools.
United Kingdom
Approximately 28 to 35 percent experience work related anxiety. HSE reports point to progress through mental health at work standards, wellbeing programs, and workplace ergonomics.
Canada stands out thanks to a proactive infrastructure combining a national standard, safety indicators, OHS KPIs, psychosocial risk training programs, management support, and workplace mental health prevention. This contrasts with more reactive and fragmented approaches elsewhere.
How can psychological safety be implemented in the workplace?
Operational Approach and Key Phases
For an organization with X employees, the challenge is to integrate psychological safety into the overall occupational risk prevention strategy, on the same level as construction safety, machine safety, workplace ergonomics, industrial hygiene, or chemical risk prevention. This relies on the risk assessment document, prevention plans, behavioral safety observations, and safety training to create an environment that supports both physical and mental health at work.
Annual anonymous survey using Edmondson scale, QWL, stress, and psychosocial risk indicators, via a digital tool or risk management software.
Integration of psychological safety into occupational risk assessment and into the risk assessment document, alongside physical risks, musculoskeletal disorders, chemical risks, and workplace accidents.
Creation of a joint committee including managers, HR, and employee representatives, responsible for defining a written action plan with KPIs and safety indicators, with a target of a 15 percent improvement in psychological safety scores within six months.
Management training and coaching, including Mental Health First Aid workshops, two days, for managers, supervisors, and HSE or QHSE leaders, focused on active listening, conflict management, and stress management.
Integration of psychosocial risk training, occupational health and safety training, QWL training, musculoskeletal disorder prevention, and workplace mental health prevention into the annual safety training plan.
Explicit linkage between psychological safety results and OHS KPIs, HR KPIs, and audit objectives, for example during a safety day or workplace safety event.
Phase 3: Team Rituals and Corporate Culture
Implementation of short check ins, five to ten minutes, during team meetings, with named or anonymous speaking rounds on “success, error, need”, to strengthen shared vigilance and reduce under reporting of near misses and risky situations.
Team charter integrated into corporate culture, including the right to make mistakes, zero interruptions, and a commitment to respond within 48 hours to incidents, whether a workplace accident, a conflict, or a signal of psychological distress.
QWL and QVCT actions such as quiet break areas, ergonomic workplace design, musculoskeletal disorder prevention, stress management workshops, and wellbeing initiatives, complementing more traditional modules like posture and movement training or occupational hygiene, depending on the sector.
Deployment of trained peer supporters in mental health, psychosocial risks, and burnout, along with a structured support system involving occupational psychologists, occupational health services, and HR support units.
Quarterly barometers combining indicators of physical and mental health at work, turnover, absenteeism, number of workplace accidents, risk analysis results, and root cause analyses.
Regular adjustments of the prevention plan and the risk assessment document, with integration into ISO 45001 and industrial health and safety frameworks.
Together, these steps combine safety training, HSE and QHSE training, management coaching, QWL and QVCT initiatives, behavioral safety observations, and risk assessment tools. They progressively transform organizational culture, moving from fear to sustainable performance, while strengthening psychological safety, industrial safety, and wellbeing at work.
Key Takeaways
- Psychological safety is not about being “nice”, but about a shared belief that people can speak openly, ask questions, admit errors, and express disagreement without fear of sanctions or humiliation.
- In 2025, Canada stands out thanks to a national standard and a systemic approach that lead roughly two thirds of employees to perceive their workplace as psychologically safe, while Belgium, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom remain more fragmented and reactive.
- In practical terms, an organization seeking progress should regularly measure its speaking climate, train its managers, establish protected speaking rituals, and monitor indicators such as psychosocial risks, turnover, and engagement over time.
FAQ
Psychological Safety in Organizations, 2025
Does psychological safety mean that criticism or performance expectations are no longer allowed?
No. Psychological safety allows people to speak openly about what is not working, precisely in order to improve performance. It protects individuals from personal attacks, not from demanding and rigorous feedback on work quality. A psychologically safe environment is one where one can say “this is not good enough” while respecting each person’s dignity and competence.
How can psychological safety be distinguished from wellbeing at work?
Wellbeing refers to an overall state, including mental health, satisfaction, and work life balance. Psychological safety is more specific. It concerns the quality of interactions within the team, especially how errors, doubts, minority opinions, and weak signals are received. It is possible to have wellbeing initiatives, such as yoga or social events, without people feeling able to speak honestly in meetings.
From what company size does this become relevant?
From as few as five to ten people. As organizations grow, effects become more structured, with silos, power dynamics, and unspoken rules. The same principles apply to an eight person startup, an eighty person SME, or a large corporation. Assess the speaking climate, train managers, ritualize expression, and address fear or harassment situations quickly.
How long does it take to see a tangible impact?
In most field feedback, an initial climate shift appears within three to six months when diagnosis, manager training, and team rituals are combined. Cultural consolidation, when it is no longer seen as “just an HR project”, typically takes twelve to twenty four months, especially in organizations marked by fear based or highly hierarchical cultures.
Which indicators should be monitored to manage psychological safety?
The most useful indicators include specific items in internal surveys, such as willingness to speak up, willingness to report errors, and feeling heard. HR signals such as turnover, absenteeism, complaints, reports, and team specific rotation. The quality of debate, for example whether meetings include real, reasoned disagreement or silent consensus. Cross referencing these indicators with implemented actions, such as training, check ins, and mediation, allows the roadmap to be adjusted.
How can a strongly business oriented leadership team be convinced?
By explicitly linking the topic to economic indicators, such as the cost of turnover, sickness absence, unreported errors, and poor quality, as well as innovation challenges, including ideas that are never voiced, and employer branding. Many cases show that a climate of psychological safety reduces hidden costs and increases adaptability, making it a strategic investment rather than a simple HR “nice to have”.
Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2024). National standard of Canada for psychological health and safety in the workplace (CAN/CSA-Z1003-13, updated 2024). https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca
Government of Canada. (2024). Élan series: Toolkit for psychologically healthy workplaces. https://www.canada.ca
Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2024). The road to psychological safety in the workplace. https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca
Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada. (2025). Summit on psychologically healthy workplaces: Synthesis report and best practices. https://awcbc.org
Mining Industry Human Resources Council. (2024). Psychological safety in the workplace. https://mihr.ca
AGA Insurance. (2025). Bill 27 and psychosocial risk prevention: Employer obligations. https://www.aga.ca
Blakes, Cassels & Graydon LLP. (2025). Psychosocial risks in the workplace: Legal analysis of Québec’s Bill 27. https://www.blakes.com
Canadian Federation of Independent Business. (2024). Psychological health and safety at work: A guide for Canadian SMEs. https://www.cfib-fcei.ca
Randstad Canada. (2025). Psychological safety at work and its impact on performance. https://www.randstad.ca
Ordre des conseillers en ressources humaines agréés du Québec. (2025). Mental Health Week: Portrait of psychological health in Canada and Québec. https://ordrecrha.org
Securex. (2025). Psychological safety and burnout: Workplace expression survey. https://www.securex.eu
Applauz Recognition Inc. (2024). Improving psychological safety at work. https://www.applauz.me
Gandee. (2025). Mental health at work: Concrete CSR actions for 2025. https://www.gandee.com
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2024). Psychosocial risks and mental health at work: European barometers. https://osha.europa.eu
Health and Safety Executive. (2025). Mental health at work: Standards and reporting framework. https://www.hse.gov.uk
Qualisocial, & Ipsos. (2025). Mental health and QVCT barometer in France. https://www.qualisocial.com
Google. (2016). Project Aristotle: Rediscovering what makes teams effective. https://rework.withgoogle.com
Harvard Business Review. (2019–2024). Psychological safety and high-performing teams. Harvard Business Publishing. https://hbr.org
McKinsey & Company. (2024). Organizational health and psychological safety: Global workforce insights. https://www.mckinsey.com